Title: Educator effectiveness guidebook for inclusive practice
Type of the resource: Handbook/Guide/Manual
Funded by: Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Authors: Mitchell D. Chester, Ed.D.
Type of disability: ALL TYPES
Target education level: Primary education
Secondary education
Language(s): English
IPR: No
OER: No
Overall objectives of the inclusive learning resource
Inclusive learning intervention logic: (What are the overall broader objectives to which the action will contribute?)
Inclusion means a place for every student in every district—students with disabilities; students who are English language learners; students who are gifted; students who are gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, or questioning; and students who seem to fall neatly into the “average” range. All students deserve a chance to learn in a safe and supportive environment.
Objectively verifiable indicators of achievement: (What are the key indicators related to the overall objectives?)
. Providing opportunities for students to demonstrate autonomy and self-advocacy by choosing appropriate learning tools and supports.
. Engaging learners in assessment discussions of what constitutes excellence and generates relevant examples that connect to students’ cultural backgrounds and interests.
. Helping students to build positive strategies for future success based on feedback and other evidence, including identifying patterns of errors and wrong answers.
Sources and means of verification: (What are the sources of information for these indicators?)
. Forty Massachusetts educators, including teachers, specialized instructional support personnel, school administrators, and district administrators
. National experts and researchers in the fields of inclusive instruction, universal design for learning, positive behavioral interventions and supports, and social-emotional learning
. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education staff with expertise in inclusive practice and educator evaluation.
. Use of UDL (Universal Design for Learning)
Risks and Challenges:
. Considering students’ diverse backgrounds, identities, strengths, and challenges during lesson planning, instruction, assessment, and classroom management.
. Creating an environment that is safe and respectful of all cultures and backgrounds.
Specific purpose of the inclusive learning resource
Inclusive learning intervention logic: (What specific objective is the resource intended to achieve to contribute to the overall objectives?)
. To identify elements within common assessments that interfere with students’ ability to demonstrate their knowledge.
. Common assessments have been identified, a system for progress monitoring should be developed to assist with charting students’ differential rates of learning.
Objectively verifiable indicators of achievement: (Which indicators clearly show that the objective of the actions/resource has been achieved?)
. In an effective common assessment, all students should have the opportunity to demonstrate growth, regardless of their baseline scores.
. Educators should review measures to ensure that they are appropriate and fair for all students, including ELL [English language learners] students and students with disabilities.
. After common assessments have been identified, a system for progress monitoring should be developed to assist with charting students’ differential rates of learning.
. After end-of-course assessments are given, the educator’s reflections about student growth should be shared with the educator’s evaluator to inform professional judgment about student learning.
Sources and means of verification: (What are the sources of information that exist or can be collected? What are the methods required to get this information?)
Risks and Challenges: (Which factors and conditions outside the user's responsibility are necessary to achieve that objective? (external conditions)) Which risks should be taken into consideration?
In inclusive settings with a diverse range of learner abilities, it is important to leverage the skills and expertise of all educators to serve students. Therefore, when appropriate, educators should consider setting professional practice goals as a team. Collaborative instructional models require clear identification of roles and responsibilities as well as shared responsibility for planning, delivering, and assessing instruction.
Expected results on implementation of the resource
Inclusive learning intervention logic: (The results are the outputs envisaged to upscale. What are the expected results?)
. Embracing high expectations for all students.
. Uses rituals, routines, and appropriate responses that create and maintain a safe physical and intellectual environment where students take academic risks and most behaviors that interfere with learning are prevented.
Objectively verifiable indicators of achievement: (What are the indicators to measure whether and to what extent the action/resource achieves the expected results?)
. Communicating with other educators (e.g., counselors, special education teachers, social workers) to support students and implement accessible instruction and positive behavior supports
. Collaborating with colleagues to implement accessible instruction strategies and positive behavior supports school wide
. Discussing student needs and progress with colleagues in professional learning communities
. Working to improve school culture and ensure the school is a welcoming place to all students
Sources and means of verification: (What are the available sources of information for these indicators?)
Risks and Challenges: (What external conditions must be met to obtain the expected results on schedule?)
. Introducing a parent or guardian survey at the beginning of the year to determine preferred forms of communication.
. Consistently adapting instruction, materials, and assessments to make challenging material accessible to all students, including English learners and students with disabilities.
. All students should have an equal chance to demonstrate high, moderate, and low growth, but not all students need to show the same change in score to do so
Activities
Inclusive learning intervention logic: (What are the key activities to be carried out and in what sequence in order to reach the expected results?)
. Actively engaging students in observable ways with high rates of varied opportunities to respond, prompts, and active supervision.
. Providing a continuum of supports to both support appropriate behavior and correct inappropriate behavior
. Acknowledging expected behavior with specific praise.
Objectively verifiable indicators of achievement: (What are the means required to implement these activities, e.g. personnel, equipment, training, studies, supplies, operational facilities, etc.)
Sources and means of verification: (What are the sources of information about action progress?)
. Collaborating on a shared vision of inclusive instructional practice.
. Continuous refinement of assessments for accessibility and universal design.
. Designing the learning environment in a way that supports all students’ learning by facilitating various learning activities (e.g., small group, learning centers) and integrating multiple opportunities for student feedback and collaboration with peers.
Risks and Challenges: (What pre-conditions are required before the use of the resource starts? What conditions outside the user's direct control have to be met for the implementation of the planned activities?)
Accessible instruction and positive behavior supports provide entry points for students with a variety of learning needs to access the core instruction. Strong student learning goals identify specific strategies aligned with accessible instruction and positive behavior supports that meet the needs of students and support their attainment of the learning goal.
Attachment:
URL:
Rate the Resource
You need to be logged in.