Title of practice: What Defines Inclusion in Higher Education Institutions? Validation of an Instrument Based on the ‘Index for Inclusion’
Author/developer: Luisa Losada Puente, María Fiuza Asorey, Manoel Baña Castro
Language: English
Description of good practice:
Optimising university access strategies and trying to reduce the risk of failure for students who do not fit the concept of traditional student requires that all involved in Higher Education make the necessary effort to embrace the ideals of inclusion. This paper presents the validation of the Scale of Perceptions on Inclusion in the University (SPIU), elaborated from the three main areas of the Index for Inclusion: Culture, Politics and Practice. A sample of 574 university students was tested. An exploratory factor analysis (n = 278) verified a solution in six factors (52.04% of the variance explained): building communities, establishing inclusive values, developing a school for everyone, organising support for diversity, orchestrating learning, and mobilising resources. A confirmatory factorial structure (n = 296) was constructed from six first-order factors, grouped around three second-order factors: culture, politics, and practice (χ2/gl = 1.494, CFI = .951, GFI = .871; RMR = .041, RMSEA = .041). An adequate reliability and validity, and moderate-to-high correlations between factors were found. This structure allows to define inclusion in the university and has an analytical and diagnosis value on the students’ interests and demands, and as a prelude to individualizing the needs of each student.
Country where the practice is developed: Spain
URL to the material: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1034912X.2021.1992752
Relevant file:
Type of practice: Research
Group(s) targeted by the material: Policy makers
The level of Creative Commons license:No licensing infromation available
Can the practice be reused?: Yes
What is the payment model for this material?: Free
What is the cost of using this material?:
What barriers does it help to overcome?: Multiple barriers
Is there anything else you would like to add about this submitted good practice material?:
Tags:
Accessibility

Background Colour Background Colour

Font Face Font Face

Font Kerning Font Kerning

Font Size Font Size

1

Image Visibility Image Visibility

Letter Spacing Letter Spacing

0

Line Height Line Height

1.2

Link Highlight Link Highlight

Text Alignment Text Alignment

Text Colour Text Colour